William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
WAIT A SECOND, LET'S REVIEW – AT 8:24 A.M. ET: The Washington Post is rhapsodizing about the impact of new sanctions on Iran. Why, the mullahs are in agony, suffering. We may even have to start feeling for them.
COMMENT: Uh, now wait. Isn't there a problem here? The man Obama will nominate today as secretary of defense has opposed these sanctions. How could a man who's opposed some of the most vital tools of the U.S. Government be named to head the Defense Department. We are, readers, in never-never land. Of course Hagel won't admit that he's opposed the sanctions. He'll get up at his confirmation hearings and say that 1) his views have evolved, 2) he was misquoted, 3) he was misinterpreted, 4) he's on board and enthusiastic about sanctions despite virtually every public statement he's made about them in the past. (See 1-3.) And there will be people who'll believe him. The crunch will come if the sanctions fail, and so far they've failed. We have to have a credible military threat that is stark and compelling, to finally convince the Iranians to deal on their nuclear program. But Hagel is already on record as opposing military action. What does that do to our credibility? Great appointment, ay? January 7, 2013
|
|