William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
OH DEAR, OH DEAR – AT 9:23 A.M. ET: In the last few days President Obama has compared himself to Martin Luther King Jr. and Abraham Lincoln. In a way, it's a step down from the days when his delirious groupies were comparing him to the deity, but King and Lincoln will do. Apparently, though, Obama believes that three's the charm, as he contemplartes adding another name to the list. From the Daily Caller:
COMMENT: Harry Truman did indeed run against the "do-nothing" Republican Congress. The charge was false, as Congress had passed a remarkable package of bills, including the legislation that shaped our defense establishment in the Cold War. But we were in a recession, so the charge resonated. A new Gallup Poll puts Congress's approval rating at a mere 13%, so Obama's strategy may make sense. However, there's a difference between Truman and Obama, and that's exactly Obama's problem – that difference. He ain't Harry. Truman wasn't particularly liked, but he was a fighter, and Americans admired that. By contrast, Truman's opponent in 1948 was Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York, who'd also been the Republican candidate in 1944 in a losing campaign against FDR. In 1948, Dewey kind of sat around waiting to be crowned king, as almost every pundit predicted he would be. Because of his pencil mustache, some came to describe him as "the man on the wedding cake." The king never got to give his speech. Feisty Harry won after a stunning whistlestop campaign through America. The pundits punted, and Tom Dewey faded into history. Obama, like Truman, isn't particularly popular, but I doubt if he has Truman's fight in him. He has more of Dewey's imperiousness. But it will all depend on the Republican candidate. August 16, 2011 |
|