William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
COMPLETELY RECKLESS - AT 6:35 P.M. ET: The White House is out with a new party line on Afghanistan. It sounds to me like a dodge, the start of a possible excuse to do nothing, or at least nothing effective, which this president has shown is his great talent. From AP:
Oh, come on. We know they have problems, but we have interests. This isn't student government. We may have to work to develop the Afghan government, but we can lose the whole effort at the same time...if we don't have enough boots on the ground.
No sense of urgency. That's the message being sent to our enemies.
No, the central question right now is numbers of troops. I don't minimize the problems with the Afghan government, but they can't dominate. Also, Emanuel didn't address the fact that Pakistan, right next door, must be stabilized. Will more American troops in Afghanistan assist with that? I don't know, but it's a key question to be asked, and actually answered. Councils of war breed defeatism, Douglas MacArthur's father taught his son. And business schools warn of "paralysis by analysis." Looks like we're cursed with both. October 18, 2009
|
|